How We Got The Bible - 1382 Words

How We Got the Bible Ever since I was born I have been attending church. At this young age they teach you everything about the main stories or the main points of the Bible. At my church I learned stories from Noah’s ark to the story of Adam and Eve eating the apple from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. I learned about who was the narrator of the Bible and who created our earth. I never knew who were the people that printed out the pages or chose a specific font for the Bible. I didn’t have the background knowledge of what country or if it were the Romans that actually created the Bible. In this world there has been several theories that the Romans were the ones that wrote it or it was the English that wrote it and printed it out. After reading the book â€Å"How we got the Bible† by Neil R. Lightfoot, it gave me the right knowledge and understanding of who wrote the wonderful collection of books. Understanding how we got the Bible means that we have to kno w how it was written, on what it was written and who wrote it. The art of writing has been used through out the world even before the time of Moses. People have been writing things down since the dawn of time, with all different types of materials. According to the book, the Old Testament was originally written on leather, while the New Testament was inked on papyrus. Although this is what the old and New Testament are written on, there are two major divisions of the New Testament: the uncials and cursives orShow MoreRelatedThe Koran And The Protestant Bible1249 Words   |  5 PagesThe Koran and the Protestant Bible Over the course of this semester, we have talked about the five main religions, each of which containing their own views, backed by their own scriptures and holy books. Due to a length limit, I am going to outline how the Protestant Bible and the Koran came to be in order to demonstrate the differences between how these books were created. I do not begin to understand all of the complications on this topic, nor will all of the arguments that could be made be touchedRead MoreThe Gospel Of Jesus Gospel Essay1009 Words   |  5 Pagesis and what it is not. It explains how the message of the gospel got lost between salvation, the Plan of salvation, justification, and the Method of Persuasion. While these things also involve Jesus and the gospel, they are not the gospel. They are the result of the gospel. McKnight discusses how these results of the gospel got bigger than the gospel itself While the complete Bible speaks of the gospel, this book explains exactly where to begin in the Bible to fully understand the gospel and whyRead MoreBiblical Inspiration By Howard Marshall1321 Words   |  6 Pagesinterpretation of the Bible, and the inspiration of the Bible in our lives of today. There are many questions that are brought up the book, and these include: Is the Bible infallible? How do we interpret the Bible today? is its inspiration believable in and biblical criticism believable? All of the different opinions on biblical issues equivalent to these bring up issues and questioning within the community. It is Marshall’s goal to try and produce a statement that is concrete of what the Bible says in ourRead MoreLife Reflection Paper736 Words   |  3 Pagesnever able to learn about the Bible or speak about my faith. I got blessed with the ability to go to a Christian school and getting to have a bible class at EC has been such a blessing, but getting the cha nce to plan chapel weekly and being in a smaller group with people who have such a close relationship with Christ is an opportunity I really want to take. I love to share my opinion and have conversations while being in class, but the past three years of being in a bible class Ive learned it is moreRead MoreThe Gospel Of The Bible922 Words   |  4 Pagescharacter, one who has sparked controversy since the beginning of his time. For one, we have very little historical proof of the life of Jesus, just writing from â€Å"a Jewish Historian named Josephus, whose writing has been confirmed by archaeological studies.† (Fisher, 302). We also have writings about Jesus’ life, in particular all that can be found in the bible. One thing that is a constant mystery, that even the bible can’t fully answer, is the childhood of the historical Jesus. That is where the InfancyRead MoreLove Of God Reflection Paper1739 Words   |  7 PagesGod and his work. From the moment we ar e born, we already are touched by the love of God. Throughout the ages, humans and God have always had a rocky relationship; from the time of fall of man to present day 2017, but even at our lowest points as humanity, he still has loved and cared for us. We are created in his image; we are his children and through him, we learn to love the ones around us and ourselves. But to love others and ourselves, we must first learn how to love God. Through my years atRead MoreThe Bible And Its Influence On My Life924 Words   |  4 Pagesthe selection to choose from to find one that changed my life is very slim. Among those books is the Bible and none of the others have had anywhere near the impact this one has had on me. By reading the Bible, it caused me to have a better life by strengthening my relationship and connection with God. Growing up I always lived in a religious household. We always prayed before we ate, prayed before we went to bed, and always went to church on Sunday and Wednesday night. While I never questioned theseRead MoreWhat Is Love? What It Is?1527 Words   |  7 PagesWhen asked the question â€Å"What is Love?† what are some of the first things that come to mind? Some people might say it is an emotion that we experience when we interact with the world around us. People can have love for many things such as money and other material possessions, family and friends, even the world around them. These are just a few examples of how we often use love in our lives. However, love is not only confined to our lives, it is also a very important emotion in religions as well. Read MoreMarriage Is The Union Of A Man And A Woman1045 Words   |  5 PagesIn today’s world the meaning of marriage is beginning to change, compared to previous years. Marriage used to mean the union of a man and a woman as partners in a relationship, but now we are beginning to see different versions of marriage. Many people believe two males or two females can be married. Or even some believe that they can marry multiple women, or even marry their own relative. You could even say that the modern definition of marriage is the union of people, whether they are man andRead MoreThe Creation Of A Creation Story1061 Words   |  5 PagesSeneca, Oneida, Onondaga, and Cayuga nations.† (Cusick 21) â€Å"The Iroquois creation myth exists in some twenty-five versions.† (Cusick 22). However, there was no concrete indication from a Native American that coincides with the Iroquois’s belief as of how and when the creation of the world began until David Cusick, tran scribed and translated an Iroquois cosmogonic myth in the nineteenth century. David Cusick became the first Native American to record on Atotarho. Grounded in nature the Iroquois religion

Essay On Dna Testing - 1154 Words

DNA is the future for choosing the right bull for your needs, but is it economically reasonable for the regular cattleman to afford this new technology and still make a profit. The information outlined in this study should impact farmers decisions of whether or not they should consider getting their bulls DNA tested for greater genetic gains that will improve their herd along with increasing their profit margins. The study was developed to estimate the economic value for using DNA information from hypothetical DNA tests associated with known proportions of selection trait genetic variation to increase the accuracy of beef bull selection in a seedstock breeding program CITE THIS SOURCE. This study used estimates to show that the math†¦show more content†¦A seedstock herd structure and breeding scheme was set up for this particular study. A seedstock herd was trying to figure out the costs of finding a better way to choose their bulls. Each young untested bull was valued based upon its own performance records, their sire, dam, and 20 parental half-siblings. Each bull was used for three years and mated 30 females and produced on average 32.5 yearling bull calves over their lifetime Cite. Eight bulls were kept for stud sires while the other 125 were sold for commercial bull use. These bulls were used as the genetically superior bulls for the rest of this study. The values that were derived for this study from selecting a genetically superior bull were calculated through mathematical equations that accounted for variation in time it took for the gene to pass on to the offspring and eventually the entire herd. The study used the gene flow method of Hill (1973), which helped them track the gene flow that had overlapping generations. They used this information to calculate the cumulative discounted expressions derived from both a superior yearling commercial sire and a genetically superior yearling stud sire Cite. They used this information to help describe ho w the genes were passed down throughout the breeding and production population based on their biological parameters and the 20-year planning horizon CITE. With the access to this information the study then went on to assessing the value associated with choosing aShow MoreRelated DNA testing Essay927 Words   |  4 Pages DNA testing has overthrown the way police collect evidence in a number of criminal cases, especially rape and murder and consequently had a large impact on many past cases. However there are many disadvantages to DNA testing, such as a challenge of accuracy, the costs of DNA testing and the possible misuse of DNA. The prospect of a national DNA database in Australia has been heavily criticised with complaints of invasion of privacy and stigma against those with terminal diseases. DeoxyribonucleicRead More DNA Chip - Genetic Testing of the Future Essay2397 Words   |  10 PagesDNA Chip - Genetic Testing of the Future Many, if not most diseases, have their roots in our genes. Genes, through the proteins they encode, determine how efficiently we process foods, how effectively we detoxify poisons, and how vigorously we respond to infections. In the past 20 years, amazing new techniques have allowed scientists to learn a great deal about how genes work and how they are linked to disease. This rapid pace of discovery of genetic factors, responsible for certain diseases,Read More DNA Testing and the Conviction of Criminals Essay1766 Words   |  8 PagesDNA Testing and the Conviction of Criminals There have been many incidents where cases have needed a solid prosecution in order to convict the defendant in a murder or rape case. This is where DNA Testing comes in to help. By taking a DNA test, a person can be found guilty or not guilty. If a person claims they have been raped there can be a sperm sample taken from the suspect in order to prove that he is guilty or not. In addition, in a murder case there can be blood taken from the suspectRead MoreNinteen Years Gone: Using DNA Testing to Catch the Crimals Essay560 Words   |  3 Pagescrime that they did not commit. So how, with all of our technology now are they still locked away behind bars? How can people just sit by and let innocent men rot away in prison while the true perpetrator of the crime is still at large? DNA, that is how. DNA testing is a fairly recent development that has allowed many wrongly convicted men to walk free after spending decades of their life in a cell. For Frank Sterling this is exactly how it happened. He was convicted of a 1988 murder. By 2010 heRead MoreAnimal Testing Should Not Be Banned891 Words   |  4 Pageswork for humans and are considered unsafe. Animal testing is barbaric; the small benefit that may be gained through testing in no way rights the torture these animals are put through. Not only is the testing harmful to the animals, it is extremely expensive. Millions of dollars a year are made by companies that provide the animals, but billions are spent on research that cannot even be used. In an effort to create data, we use animal testing results and try to apply it to the genetic makeup ofRead MoreThe Information Found On Two Reliable Internet Websites1424 Words   |  6 Pageswill be useful for the human awareness essay, ‘Should genetically modified food be produced?’ will be the evidence supporting advantages and disadvantages on the matter for a strong comparison in the essay and a strong top ic about containing information on how much money will be lost due to labeling genetically modified food. All the information found in the two sources are useful for proving points of view and holding statistical information for my essay. It could be beneficial in the aspect ofRead MoreThe technique of gene cloning has important applications in medicine, biotechnology, agriculture and research.1171 Words   |  5 Pagesis achieved by inserting a required gene into a vector DNA. This produces Recombinant DNA and when introduced to a host cell the vector is copied. It divides to produce lots of copies of the gene of interest (Willey, Sherwood and Woolverton, 2012). There are many applications of gene cloning, the two which will be discussed in this essay are; genetically modified crops and using genetic fingerprinting for identification and relationship testing. Genetically modified crops can contain genes from sourcesRead MoreCoping with Methuselah Essay814 Words   |  4 PagesCoping with Methuselah Lu’Ciana S. Knight Eng./215 Date February 26, 2013 Tracy A. Boothe Coping with Methuselah Methuselah was a patriarch of the Bible who was said to have lived for 969 years. In the essay â€Å"Coping with Methuselah† they discuss the possibility of manipulating the genetics that shape living beings. Also, with the declining rate of human mortality year after year we will soon see humans living well in to a century or more. With this rise in life span also comes a rise inRead MoreUsage of Animals in Biomedical Experiments1175 Words   |  5 PagesThe great advances in medicine have been the results of many researches carried out by scientists who did many experiments to test the validity of their theories. Such experiments demanded using animals in testing which proved to be beneficial for ages in spite of the objections it raised among animal protectors. Yet the usage of animals in biomedical experiments has increased significantly over the past decade creating more and constant debate on whether the benefits of these experiments overweighRead MoreRelationship Bet ween Reason And Emotion1334 Words   |  6 Pagesexample that comes to mind is the fact that I am currently working on this essay late at night while earlier I had wasted time reading articles on the Internet and watching football. Still, Coleridge believed that the positive effects of emotions outweighed the negative. This raises the question to what extent do emotions play a role in the pursuit of knowledge? And would our pursuit be better off without emotion? This essay will primarily analyze the relationship between reason and emotion, arriving

Contrast Between Socrates And The Sophists free essay sample

# 8217 ; Style Essay, Research Paper In Gorgias by Plato, Socrates # 8217 ; beloved trade of doctrine comes into struggle with the art of oratory, used by the Sophists Gorgias, Polus, and Callicles. In the resulting treatment, aimed at detecting the true nature and intent of oratory, a crisp contrast in the manner of address used by Socrates and that utilized by the speechmakers comes into position. The two sides employ really distinguishable methods of address, each method back uping the terminal of the talker # 8217 ; s speech.Socrates # 8217 ; method of address is a duologue. He engages in an even exchange between himself and the other participants. He allows for feedback and even defense of his points, every bit good as encourages others to show their ain points. Sophists, nevertheless, use the art of oratory. Oratory is a nonreversible address in which the talker tends to talk to his audience as opposed to talking with his audience. The audience of an speechmaker is simply a group of hearers for the talker to pass on his thoughts to, but when take parting in a treatment with Socrates # 8217 ; one is expected to have and see the thoughts of the talker, every bit good as explicate his ain thoughts and lend feedback to the talker # 8217 ; s thoughts.When Socrates # 8217 ; speaks of a subject, he by and large has cognition of what he speaks. The facts he presents are known by him to be existent true facts. His ultimate intent is to get at the truth through a logical treatment of the known facts that he presents. Conversely, a Sophist need non needfully be informed about the topic he presents to his audience. A Sophist attentions non about the existent ownership of cognition, but alternatively the visual aspect of cognition, and therefore can non accurately talk the truth about the topics of their addresss. This is of small significance to a Sophist, nevertheless, for he has little regard for what is true and wha t is non. The full purpose of a Sophist # 8217 ; s address is to carry the audience to explicate an sentiment in maintaining with the personal involvements of the talker himself. Whereas Socrates # 8217 ; views the proliferation of inaccurate information as the greatest of all immoralities, a Sophist patterns it daily and seeks to stand out at the art of misrepresentation, in order to go better able to win people over with flattery and false facts.Socrates # 8217 ; statements are based on deductive logical thinking. He arrives at valid decisions by first saying general, well-known facts, upon which he bases more comparative facts, and finally forces his opposition to either concede, based on facts he himself has agreed are true, or refute Socrates through the usage of logic and true facts. The tool used by the Sophists in their effort to formalize their statements is inductive concluding. They create wide generalisations based upon ascertained grounds and popular sentiment. This is slightly less concrete than Socrates # 8217 ; method, for his statements lie on a foundation of incontestable facts, while the # 8220 ; facts # 8221 ; presented by the Sophists are true merely because they are normally accepted, though it is surely problematic whether or non they have any existent truth in them.Another point of contrast between Socrates # 8217 ; and the Sophists is that Socrates bases his statements on a realist point of position. He believes that there exists a definite bad and good , right and incorrect. The intent of many of his statements, in fact, are to set up precisely what is good or bad, or right or incorrect. Sophists, nevertheless, follow a more relativist doctrine. They seem to believe that such qualities as bad and good, or right and incorrect exist merely in man’s reading of such things and there is no existent definition of such footings. Socrates # 8217 ; manner of address is good to him in that it aids him in his pursuit to find the truth. His logical, factual foundation helps construct up to a logical, fact-based decision. Although he is non peculiarly crafty in the art of oratory, he has no desire to carry people to any sentiment other than that of the truth. Similarly, yet oppositely, the Sophists excel at the art of oratory, which is good to them in that it allows them to better carry people and therefore it makes them more capable in the art they pattern, though Socrates # 8217 ; sentiment of how helpful this is to the Sophists is rather different. He believes that even if a Sophist is able to carry any individual he likes, his art is still non good to him. In fact, Socrates goes every bit far as to state that, merely like a autocrat, the speechmaker of a town has the least sum of power ( 466b ) . His footing for such a theory is that since both the speechmaker and the autocrat are uninformed on the subject a bout which they speak, they can non do informed determinations and hence, they do non what is needfully what is good for them and therefore what they want, but merely what they see fit at the clip. As Polus seemed to bespeak, the speechmaker # 8217 ; s doctrine is one of pure hedonism. Instantaneous pleasance is the end of their every action.There are certain incompatibilities in both parties # 8217 ; manner of address, nevertheless. In Socrates # 8217 ; instance, for illustration, it was antecedently stated the Socrates # 8217 ; utilised deductive logical thinking as opposed to inductive logical thinking, whose decisions were less house, yet Socrates # 8217 ; at times makes usage of inductive logical thinking. In fact, the many of the most basic facts upon which he bases his statements are, of necessity, true merely because adult male has defined them as such, or because it is in maintaining with what is by and large believed by the bulk of people, but has neer been or can non be scientifically proved. For case, there is no scientific manner to turn out that something is the colour yellow, at some point it simply comes down to the fact that something is the colour yellow merely because that is what adult male has defined it as. Socrates # 8217 ; definitions as things such felicity as good, while non needfully untrue, are impossible to turn out. Happiness is different things to different people and though Socrates # 8217 ; opts to believe in a popular reading of the word, he has no factual footing for his claims.Obviously, there are many struggles in manner of address between Socrates and the Sophists, but despite these legion differences, each of their methods is good tailored to their intent and serves to back up and even magnify the points that the talker puts away. Each manner surely has its benefits every bit good as drawbacks, yet it is hard to judge which is more effectual, as each has its ain different end in head and each fulfills its terminal rather efficaciously when in the custodies of a gifted talker.

Tony Harrison free essay sample

The second paragraph envisions Harrison’s recalling to the northern accent he used to speak, coinciding with the recovery of his identity. The poem opens with a comparison of Harrison with Demosthenes (ll. 1-2). It is necessary to know the following facts about the greatest of the Greek orators, to understand the allegory: Demosthenes suffered from a speech impediment in his youth which earned him the disrespect and mockery of his vicinity. Nobody ever believed that he would be able to compose and recite stirring speeches. Only through sheer willpower, Demosthenes endured the contempt of his environment until he finally succeeded and gained acknowledgement. The irregular rhythm of the first stanza illustrates the stuttering of the Greek orator. In addition to that, the frequent use of plosive and hissing sounds like in â€Å"stutterer† or in â€Å"outshouting seas† develops aggressive tension. Harrison continues to enhance piquant passages by using onomatopoeia throughout the entire poem. We will write a custom essay sample on Tony Harrison or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page But back to Demosthenes: Within the following stanzas, the recipient discerns that Harrison also saw himself confronted with the condescension of his vicinity. In the second stanza, the focus shifts on the author himself declaiming a passage out of Shakespeare’s Mac Beth (ll. 3-5). After a few words he is interrupted harshly. He is told that, due to his northern accent, he is unworthy to play an important role in the drama. The producer insists that the only language worth reciting poetry is RP. Harrison is told that his unconventional pronunciation is a plague for the â€Å"cultural heritage† (l. 5). He is defamed as T. W. , the barbarian who is at most allowed to play the drunken porter, a role written in prose. In the Elizabethan Age prose was employed as the language of the common and uncultivated people. Within the plays of Shakespeare or other Elizabethan playwrights, prose characters merely functioned as comic elements. In the present, the RP-speaking class still conserves this convention at their advantage by determining Received Pronunciation as the speech of the educated class and therefore the only speech worth declaiming poetry. Conclusively, a man with a northern accent like Anthony Harrison is predetermined to play the drunken porter albeit he may have the actuarial talent to play Duncan. Harrison has to realise, that his â€Å"speech is in the hand of the Receivers† (l. 12). The ambiguity of the word ‘Receivers’ caricatures the process of dubbing poetry into RP. On the one hand, ‘Receivers’ naturally refers to the RP-speaking people. On the other hand, Receivers may also refer to those officials that wind up a company that ceased trading. The allegory becomes evident: As the officials wind up a company, the Receivers wind up poetry. Harrison is impotent against this rigid convention or as it is euphemistically named this â€Å"cultural heritage† (l. ) and adopts RP to increase his chances for an actuarial career. It is striking that Harrison employs an interesting technique to depict the sound of his accent by codifying it just as faithfully as possible, for instance in line three where he recites: â€Å"mi ‘art aches†. As a result, the recipient is able to imagine remarkably exactly how Harrison’s pronuncia tion sounds. One nearly hears his voice in one’s head. In addition, two stereotypes of the northern accent are revealed: the elision of ‘h’ and the pronunciation of ‘y’ rather as ‘i’. Moreover, a leitmotif in the poem is the different pronunciation of the ‘u’ in ‘us’. The R. P. -speaking population rather pronounces it [a], whereas the people living north of the river Humber pronounce it [u]. It is no chance that Harrison epitomises this difference by the word ‘us’. [uz] encloses all the people speaking Harrison’s accent. In the moment, Harrison doffs his flat ‘a’ and pronounces us as [as] (ll. 13), he is no longer himself but rather one of ‘them’ â€Å"them and us†, as it is said in the title. The trap is shut (l. 13). The word ‘trap’ is also ambivalent. On the one hand ‘trap’ is a vulgarism for ‘mouth’. In this respect, trap means that Harrison ceases to speak his accent which the RP-speaking vicinity considers to be vulgar. On the other hand, he is also caught in the trap of prejudiced conventions which force him to deny his identity against his will to reach the position he strives for. Again, Harrison’s indignation is nearly audible through the accumulation of hissing and plosive sounds. Words like ‘stuffed’, ‘glottals’, ‘lumps’ ,‘ hawk’ or ‘spit’ (ll. 15/16) load up the passage with striking aggression. Finally, the exaggerated way of spelling the word â€Å"enunciate† as â€Å"e-nun-ciate† (l. 16) connotes it with a rather schoolmasterly aura. The reader may envision a teacher or possibly a parent with a raised index-finger forcing a child to ‘e-nun-ciate’. Obviously, Harrison is no more a child but an adult man, well able to decide individually on the form of expressing himself. Therefore, Harrison illustrates the process of returning to his language roots within the second part of the poem. Certain strands are reversed, indicating the turning point. For instance, Harrison who was defamed as a barbarian in the first part now himself devalues the RP-speaking people as ‘buggers’ (l. 17) and their dubbed poetry as ‘leasehold Poetry’ (l. 18). It is obvious that employs the word ‘leasehold’ to display that the ‘Receivers’ merely have an art at their disposal that does not belong to them. Moreover, he treats the pronunciation with the same contemptuous irony that his accent was treated before by spelling the word literature as it would sound in RP: Litterchewer (l. 19), a word reminding of a dustbin. It is also conspicuous that the words ‘Poetry’ and ‘Litterchewer’ are linked, as they are both capitalised. Farther, Harrison spits the bones of Litterchewer â€Å"into the lap of dozing Daniel Jones† (ll. 19-20). This metaphor might indicate two things: Firstly, the alliteration ‘dozing Daniel’ might enfold that the importance of the slight difference of the cardinal vowels is as dead and buried as their discoverer. Secondly Harrison’s rude language discloses how much he detests Jones’ achievement, since with the discovery of the cardinal vowels the theoretical division of accents began. It is prominent that Harrison more and more rediscovers his identity. He drops the unemotional and impersonal initials T. W. he had been â€Å"harried as† (l. 21) and uses his own name and voice again (l. 22). The triple repetition of [ z] strengthens his returning self-assurance. Finally, the face to face position of the abbreviations RP and his initials T. W. wholly reveals the close semantic connection between personality and speech. Consequently, Harrison ceases with both of them simultaneously: his false identity perforates within the moment he stops speaking the false accent which is not him. He is Tony Harrison again, no longer one of them (l. 23). Fitting to that, the rhyme scheme alters as well in this stanza. Throughout the entire first part of the poem, Harrison continuously used pair rhymes. Within the fifth stanza he mixes real pair rhymes with mere eye-rhymes and while emphasising that he uses his own voice again, the lines do not rhyme at all (ll. 21/22). This coincidence obviously enhances that Harrison has completely ‘doffed’ the high-flown style which he had formerly adopted. Harrison even uses his natural language explicitly by saying: ‘yer buggers’ (l. 17). On top of that, he cements his argumentation by referring to Wordsworth’s eye-rhymes (ll. 26/27). He postulates that once one fully acknowledges those rhymes that only rhyme on the paper one also has to accept the use of accents as a rhetorical means which dyes a passage in a new colour. At the end of the poem, Harrison illustrates how his first mention in the Times let him gain official acceptance. , as the nickname ‘Tony’ which rather implies a rebellious child whose obscenities may be tolerated but by no means respected transforms into ‘Anthony’ the name of a fully acknowledged adult.